Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
tmaParticipanttma March 7, 2017 at 9:26 pm in reply to: Store Thru *Warning* Signal Level Higher than Ref Level //php bbp_reply_id(); ?>
Hi Andrew,
I must admit I don’t understand the logic of using +40 dBm as the reference considering that level is much higher than the tracking generator output.
I believe the store-thru cycle always must be done to set the calibration reference. When I get back to this project I will give that a try but I am not optimistic. I don’t think that I will have proper calibration without first doing the store thru cycle to measure the test bed insertion loss across the relevant frequency spectrum.
Thanks!
tma
tmaParticipanttma March 7, 2017 at 9:15 am in reply to: Store Thru *Warning* Signal Level Higher than Ref Level //php bbp_reply_id(); ?>
Hi Andrew,
Many thanks for your prompt response! I am glad you were able to reproduce the issue and that I wasn’t doing something wrong, (:/).
I need to get back up to try the work around. If I change the reference will that upset the thru reference calibration resulting in an “Uncalibrated” message at the bottom?
Thanks Again!
tma
tmaParticipanttma February 2, 2017 at 9:40 pm in reply to: HowTo Correct UNCALIBRATED Label on Tracking Generator Sweep Display //php bbp_reply_id(); ?>
Greetings Justin,
Many thanks for your prompt reply!
Best Regards,
- AuthorPosts