Forums › SA Series Discussions › Possibility of adding Trigger out on BB60C ?
- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 2 months ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
AnonymousInactiveHello!
I was wondering if there is any chance that you could add “Trigger out” function (to 10MHz Ref In/Out for instance) to internal FPGA code.
It function would be to generate trigger out signal when SA is set to trigger on a Video trigger..Purpose of that functionality is to enable cross trigger of external scope /logic analyser to a RF burst to achieve same or similar functionality like Tek MDO4000 scopes.
It would be a great enhancement to your product and would make it immensely more powerful and useful in troubleshooting todays mixed digital /RF communication products.Thanks and best regards!
Sinisa
Justin CrooksModeratorSinisa,
We do not have any plans to add this to the BB60C, although I can definitely see the use cases. I may propose adding Video Trigger Out to our SM200A, which has a much bigger FPGA and more I/O resources.In many cases, you can use the Trigger In for tests of this nature. For example, if your scope or signal source can provide a trigger, this could be sent to the BB60C trigger in.
Hopefully this helps.
AnonymousInactiveDear Justin,
Thank you for your answer.
I will once again respectfully reiterate my stance that you should consider this as my “request” and not “suggestion”. I’m not a liberal arts student and know that this function could be added to BB60C FPGA, only if your company thought it was important enough, which you apparently don’t. It doesn’t need much resources..
I couldn’t care less for SM200A, because it is many times more expensive and has specs that I don’t need. I will probably never buy it. You can add whatever you want on it. It’s not important to me.
Trigger IN is useful only in some cases, namely when I want to monitor RF burst after analog/digital event. And I do that already.. What I can’t do is correlate which digital event time correlates with RF event.. It is not just “a use case” it’s “THE use case”. For the money I paid for BB60C I could have bought classic scanning SA with better phase noise specs etc etc.
I bought BB60C for real time signal analysis.. It so appears I’ll be able to do only subset of things I was planning to do with it….
So, again, I thank you for your quick and honest answer. I’m not trying to say anything was misrepresented to me. Product works as specified. No problem there.
Problem is that if you listen very closely to what customers ask for, and if you implement all you realistically can, you will get unbeatable product… Trig out would make you product open whole new market… At this moment only MDO4000 series does propper frequency/time domain correlation.. Having Trig IN and OUT would make that any person with a scope would have that capability… If they buy SignalHound….. And not the 10000 USD one, but the one they can afford…
If I were you I would not dismiss this idea lightly..Thanks for your time and effort.
Best regards,
Sinisa
Justin CrooksModeratorSinisa,
Thank you for your reply. I guess to clarify my answer, the BB60C’s FPGA unfortunately cannot be upgraded in the field. An FPGA update would be a logistical challenge. Even though I think it would be a powerful addition, I think it will have to wait until the next generation.
The SM200A is a product that is actively being developed. And its FPGA is field upgradeable. It is probably practical to add the feature here, even though I realize it won’t help you.Best Regards,
Justin
AnonymousInactiveJustin,
thanks for being patient with me :-). I really appreciate it.Thanks for the answer. It does explain it better.
You could spin off a BB60D version, and I personally wouldn’t mind paying return and upgrade fees for this kind of upgrade..
Or I would be willing to pay for trade in upgrade…
Anyways, again, thank you for your support.
Have a good weekend!
Regards,
Sinisa- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.